cvs commit: src/libexec/ftp-proxy ftp-proxy.c src/libexec/rexecd rexecd.c src/libexec/rlogind rlogind.c src/libexec/rshd rshd.c src/libexec/telnetd sys_term.c src/sbin/disklabel disklabel.c src/sbin/mount_portal activate.c src/usr.bin/rsh rsh.c .
Simon 'corecode' Schubert
corecode at fs.ei.tum.de
Sat May 26 02:13:47 PDT 2007
Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
Matt, I know that you are conservative regarding DragonFly's
infrastructure, and I think this is the right way to do it. However I
think this doesn't mean that we have to stick to CVS forever. If
there is a tool which is more reliable than CVS *and*
How do you measure reliability? I don't remember any other version
control system that serves open source community as long as CVS.
You can't take a automatic benchmark, of course. But you could -- for example -- review code + development process and underlying data structures. The nice thing about CVS is that basically everything is in plain text and available in separate files.
Serve - BSD +++ RENT this banner advert +++ ASCII Ribbon /"\
Work - Mac +++ space for low â¬â¬â¬ NOW!1 +++ Campaign \ /
Party Enjoy Relax | http://dragonflybsd.org Against HTML \
Dude 2c 2 the max ! http://golden-apple.biz Mail + News / \
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: "Description: OpenPGP digital signature"
More information about the Commits