[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #2259] (Closed) off_t type definition

[Sascha Wildner via Redmine]

Issue #2259 has been updated by Sascha Wildner.

Status changed from New to Closed

Yes it is int64_t on Free and long long on open, both signed.

----------------------------------------
Bug #2259: off_t type definition
http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2259

Author: Robin Carey
Status: Closed
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


Dear DragonFlyBSD bugs,

Whilst checking some software I wrote (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org), I
discovered that the

off_t

type is a signed value (on leaf.dragonflybsd.org).

On OpenBSD and FreeBSD, off_t is an unsigned value (which I assume is what
it is supposed to be).

-- 
Sincerely,

Robin Carey BSc


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account