Looks like split of execve(2) syscall created bugs

Matthew Dillon dillon at apollo.backplane.com
Sat Jan 29 14:43:26 PST 2005


:I can't agree. It's much easier to handle it in the
:imgact_shell - it only adds 2 new lines of the code.
:Additional benefit will be that the code is the same
:in FreeBSD and DF after that (you are probably don't
:care, but anyway ;), since it's what I am going to
:commit in few minutes.
:
:-Maxim
:
:Index: imgact_shell.c
:===================================================================
:RCS file: /home/dcvs/src/sys/kern/imgact_shell.c,v
:...

   ewww.   I don't like the idea of doing something in one module and
   undoing it in another.  It's too much of a hack.  Lets try to come up
   with a better solution.

						-Matt





More information about the Bugs mailing list